<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disqualification and the path to tolerance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charismatips.com/disqualification-and-the-path-to-tolerance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charismatips.com/disqualification-and-the-path-to-tolerance/</link>
	<description>From Charisma Coaching</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:36:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ezmech</title>
		<link>http://www.charismatips.com/disqualification-and-the-path-to-tolerance/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>ezmech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 00:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charismatips.com/?p=151#comment-778</guid>
		<description>Hey man, love the blog&amp;podcasts, please keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey man, love the blog&amp;podcasts, please keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SocialHitchHiker</title>
		<link>http://www.charismatips.com/disqualification-and-the-path-to-tolerance/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>SocialHitchHiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 02:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charismatips.com/?p=151#comment-773</guid>
		<description>My point is not to relate there, it is that if i can do it with such an extreme example a less extreme topic is easier. However in less extreme topics if i can&#039;t see their point of view and i get judgemental then maybe they won&#039;t ever feel comfortable enough to let me know their extreme views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is not to relate there, it is that if i can do it with such an extreme example a less extreme topic is easier. However in less extreme topics if i can&#8217;t see their point of view and i get judgemental then maybe they won&#8217;t ever feel comfortable enough to let me know their extreme views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.charismatips.com/disqualification-and-the-path-to-tolerance/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 01:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charismatips.com/?p=151#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Dan, I think there are times when a person has attitudes that are so repugnant that you simply have to take a stand and not play games with them. The Hitler example for one. If someone admires Hitler, they are not someone with which I would like to associate with, I would simply exit as soon as possible. Also, were anyone to overhear you saying that Hitler was &quot;an incredibly charismatic riveting leader&quot;, they are not going to care about the reasons why you said it (ie. Juggler Method). All they will think, and tell there friends, and the media, etc. is that you admire Hitler. The mud will have stuck and no amount of explaining about DQ&#039;ing, relating and the theory of Juggler Method that explains WHY you related to his comment will convince them otherwise. This is the pragmatic edge of relating - we have to remember what world we actually live in and be very careful when it comes to hot-button topics like Hitler, terrorism, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I think there are times when a person has attitudes that are so repugnant that you simply have to take a stand and not play games with them. The Hitler example for one. If someone admires Hitler, they are not someone with which I would like to associate with, I would simply exit as soon as possible. Also, were anyone to overhear you saying that Hitler was &#8220;an incredibly charismatic riveting leader&#8221;, they are not going to care about the reasons why you said it (ie. Juggler Method). All they will think, and tell there friends, and the media, etc. is that you admire Hitler. The mud will have stuck and no amount of explaining about DQ&#8217;ing, relating and the theory of Juggler Method that explains WHY you related to his comment will convince them otherwise. This is the pragmatic edge of relating &#8211; we have to remember what world we actually live in and be very careful when it comes to hot-button topics like Hitler, terrorism, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

